IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Jackstadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 20 19 39 0.661 0.2454 0.2527 0.6999 0.7206
2013-14 Fargo Force USHL 58 4 10 14 0.241 0.1537 0.1451 0.7234 0.6830
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 47 7 17 24 0.511 0.1896 0.1757 0.5406 0.5011
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 32 1 5 6 0.188
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 30 4 4 8 0.267
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 27 3 0 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Alaska Anchorage
-20.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21372
Forward overall
#854
Forward born in 1994
#2112
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Perichak
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
David Lappin
Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Reinholz
Hamline · 2013-14
0.759 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.