← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Jackstadt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 59 20 19 39 0.661 0.2429 0.2501 0.6977 0.7183
2013-14 Fargo Force USHL 58 4 10 14 0.241 0.1424 0.1344 0.7250 0.6845
2014-15 Kenai River Brown Bears NAHL 47 7 17 24 0.511 0.1876 0.1739 0.5389 0.4995
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA JR 32 1 5 6 0.188
2016-17 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA SO 30 4 4 8 0.267
2015-16 Alaska Anchorage D1 WCHA FR 27 3 0 3 0.111
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.11
2015-16 · Alaska Anchorage
-17.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#28232
Forward overall
#1088
Forward born in 1994
#2457
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Suffolk · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Maria · 2022-23
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2015-16
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.