IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hunter Anderson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 59 19 18 37 0.627 0.2328 0.2392 0.6640 0.6824
2013-14 Lincoln Stars USHL 47 4 7 11 0.234 0.1490 0.1404 0.7012 0.6606
2014-15 Langley Rivermen BCHL 58 11 19 30 0.517 0.2013 0.1852 0.7542 0.6940
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Minnesota D1 BigTen — 34 7 13 20 0.588
2019-20 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SR 12 4 1 5 0.417
2018-19 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen JR 22 2 11 13 0.591
2017-18 Wisconsin-Stout D3 BigTen SO 23 5 7 12 0.522
2016-17 Alabama-Huntsville D1 — SO 10 1 1 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2016-17 · Alabama-Huntsville
+39.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21256
Forward overall
#849
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Marc Biggs
Salve Regina · 2011-12
0.962 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Peter Rodrigues
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Carvalho
Morrisville · 2012-13
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.