IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Louie Rowe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-03-17 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Texas Tornado NAHL 60 8 11 19 0.317 0.1164 0.1199 0.3347 0.3447
2013-14 Omaha Lancers USHL 46 3 8 11 0.239 0.1410 0.1332 0.7175 0.6776
2014-15 Omaha Lancers USHL 60 18 21 39 0.650 0.3834 0.3432 1.9505 1.7461
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Arizona State D1 NCHC SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Arizona State D1 NCHC JR 32 2 5 7 0.219
2016-17 Arizona State D1 NCHC SO 32 7 10 17 0.531
2015-16 Arizona State D1 NCHC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#20896
Forward overall
#804
Forward born in 1994

D1 Comparables

David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Carlos Amestoy
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Miller
Adrian · 2006-07
1.679 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Skylur Jameson
Wentworth · 2007-08
1.778 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Mark Loza
Suffolk · 2001-02
1.308 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.