IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jalen Schulz Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 48 5 8 13 0.271 0.0995 0.1080 0.2858 0.3103
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 57 2 7 9 0.158 0.0931 0.0931 0.4742 0.4743
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 56 2 6 8 0.143 0.0843 0.0802 0.4292 0.4082
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SR 25 1 1 2 0.080
2017-18 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 32 2 3 5 0.156
2016-17 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 9 0 1 1 0.111
2015-16 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 12 0 1 1 0.083
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2015-16 · Nebraska Omaha
3.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17858
Defenseman overall
#2080
Defenseman born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Aleksi Rossi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Dylan Healey
Trinity · 2015-16
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Allen
Utica · 2016-17
0.448 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Gysbers
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.