← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Allen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-15 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Haliburton County Huskies OJHL 23 2 1 3 0.130 0.0320 0.0322 0.0893 0.0899
2016-17 Northeast Generals NAHL 10 1 0 1 0.100 0.0355 0.0350 0.1050 0.1036
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 50 1 23 24 0.480 0.1109 0.1047 0.3881 0.3664
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Utica D3 UCHC GR 22 5 16 21 0.955
2021-22 Utica D3 UCHC SR 29 8 32 40 1.379
2020-21 Utica D3 UCHC JR 10 0 11 11 1.100
2019-20 Utica D3 UCHC SO 29 4 19 23 0.793
2018-19 Utica D3 UCHC FR 29 2 11 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2018-19 · Utica
+518.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8758
Defenseman overall
#1555
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2021-22
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2015-16
0.391 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.