IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jerad Rosburg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-06-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 — USHL 45 2 6 8 0.178 0.1049 0.1109 0.5335 0.5640
2014-15 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 12 2 2 4 0.333 0.1966 0.1982 1.0001 1.0081
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Michigan State D1 BigTen SR 36 4 13 17 0.472
2018-19 Michigan State D1 BigTen JR 36 4 12 16 0.444
2017-18 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 36 1 10 11 0.306
2016-17 Michigan State D1 BigTen SO 33 3 8 11 0.333
2015-16 Michigan D1 BigTen — 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#9498
Defenseman overall
#1484
Defenseman born in 1996
#3369
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Chris Leibinger
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.13 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cutler Martin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Michigan (0.47 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Doyle Somerby
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Boston University (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Benning
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Renouf
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.49 PPG
→ Maine (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Pier-Olivier Cotnoir
Norwich · 2007-08
0.808 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Resnick
Tufts · 2020-21
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Murfitt
Manhattanville · 2001-02
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.