IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Max Resnick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-09-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Kent School NE-Prep 5 3 4 7 1.400 0.2822 0.2822 0.6408 0.6408
2021-22 Kent School NE-Prep 26 10 30 40 1.538 0.3102 0.3102 0.7042 0.7042
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Tufts D3 NESCAC SR 25 10 11 21 0.840
2024-25 Tufts D3 NESCAC JR 26 10 12 22 0.846
2023-24 Tufts D3 NESCAC SO 26 9 19 28 1.077
2022-23 Tufts D3 NESCAC FR 25 7 11 18 0.720
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.72
2022-23 · Tufts
+181.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
42%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9763
Forward overall
#319
Forward born in 2003
#16
in NE-Prep

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mike Collins
Elmira · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ashton Collazo
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Principato
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.389 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.