IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Hatcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 — OHL 35 1 4 5 0.143 0.0827 0.0858 0.3672 0.3812
2012-13 Peterborough Petes OHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.1320 0.1304 0.5861 0.5790
2013-14 Peterborough Petes OHL 35 3 5 8 0.229 0.1322 0.1238 0.5874 0.5502
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0737 0.0657 0.3754 0.3349
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2016-17 · Salve Regina
+328.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12954
Defenseman overall
#1627
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Blake Forslund
Fredonia · 2012-13
0.364 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Levi Carter
Concordia · 2023-24
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Hartviksen
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.