← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Hatcher Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 OHL 35 1 4 5 0.143 0.0829 0.0861 0.3662 0.3801
2012-13 Peterborough Petes OHL 57 4 9 13 0.228 0.1324 0.1308 0.5845 0.5775
2013-14 Peterborough Petes OHL 35 3 5 8 0.229 0.1327 0.1243 0.5858 0.5487
2014-15 Tri-City Storm USHL 16 1 1 2 0.125 0.0768 0.0685 0.3683 0.3285
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE FR 25 3 6 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2016-17 · Salve Regina
+320.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12837
Defenseman overall
#1617
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2021-22
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2021-22
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Norwich · 2015-16
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.