IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Levi Carter Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-03-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Penticton Vees BCHL 12 0 4 4 0.333 0.1284 0.1284 0.4857 0.4857
2021-22 Merritt Centennials BCHL 51 5 16 21 0.412 0.1587 0.1609 0.6000 0.6081
2022-23 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 50 12 8 20 0.400 0.1342 0.1293 0.3707 0.3573
2023-24 Camrose Kodiaks AJHL 55 15 12 27 0.491 0.1646 0.1509 0.4550 0.4171
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Concordia D3 MIAC — 27 8 7 15 0.556
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC — 25 5 12 17 0.680
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.68
2024-25 · Concordia
+458.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#36347
Forward overall
#2241
Forward born in 2003

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Brown
SUNY Cortland · 2014-15
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joseph Sposit
Nichols · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Bulawka
Hamilton · 2021-22
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.