IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Christian Evers Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 44 4 6 10 0.227 0.1690 0.1730 0.8481 0.8681
2014-15 — NTDP-U18 56 2 6 8 0.143 0.1062 0.1036 0.5332 0.5200
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 49 6 12 18 0.367 0.2167 0.2185 1.1031 1.1122
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 60 8 10 18 0.300 0.1770 0.1694 0.9010 0.8624
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SR 13 4 3 7 0.538
2019-20 Vermont D1 HockeyEast JR 29 6 5 11 0.379
2018-19 Vermont D1 HockeyEast SO 29 2 5 7 0.241
2017-18 Vermont D1 HockeyEast FR 29 2 7 9 0.310
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2017-18 · Vermont
+73.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7727
Defenseman overall
#1402
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matt Williams
Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Wahlin
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2011-12
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Shane Baker
Skidmore · 2023-24
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.