IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Olczyk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 20 2 4 6 0.300 0.1770 0.1897 0.9002 0.9650
2014-15 — USHL 35 1 4 5 0.143 0.0843 0.0862 0.4288 0.4386
2015-16 South Shore Kings USPHL-Premier-Classic 32 9 16 25 0.781 0.2193 0.2249 0.6422 0.6587
2016-17 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 29 5 3 8 0.276 0.1014 0.0970 0.2916 0.2788
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 11 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Colorado College D1 NCHC — 6 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#39157
Forward overall
#1727
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liam Blais
Wisconsin-Superior · 2015-16
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Stafne
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.538 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mason Frary
SUNY Potsdam · 2024-25
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.