← New Search ↗ Social Card

Donovan Gardiner Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1993-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 59 9 19 28 0.475 0.1029 0.1145 0.3671 0.4083
2010-11 CCHL 49 3 6 9 0.184 0.0398 0.0423 0.1421 0.1510
2011-12 OJHL 42 0 9 9 0.214 0.0525 0.0533 0.1474 0.1498
2012-13 NAHL 45 2 7 9 0.200 0.0711 0.0703 0.2110 0.2087
2013-14 Tri-City Storm USHL 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0295 0.0267 0.1497 0.1353
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 9 2 4 6 0.667
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 23 3 7 10 0.435
2015-16 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 27 1 6 7 0.259
2014-15 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 26 1 10 11 0.423
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.04
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.42
2014-15 · Westfield State
+914.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25098
Defenseman overall
#2188
Defenseman born in 1993

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Oswego · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Castleton · 2011-12
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.