← New Search ↗ Social Card

Taylor Derynck Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-10 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Alberni Valley Bulldogs BCHL 22 2 3 5 0.227 0.0876 0.0946 0.3303 0.3567
2015-16 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 43 1 7 8 0.186 0.0358 0.0368 0.1172 0.1205
2016-17 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 53 2 5 7 0.132 0.0254 0.0249 0.0832 0.0815
2017-18 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 41 1 11 12 0.293 0.0563 0.0524 0.1844 0.1717
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Marian D3 NCHA SR 16 0 1 1 0.062
2020-21 Marian D1 NCHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Marian D3 NCHA JR 8 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Marian D1 NCHA SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Marian D3 NCHA SO 12 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Marian D1 NCHA FR 19 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Marian D3 NCHA FR 19 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20471
Defenseman overall
#2625
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2024-25
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Curry · 2021-22
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2012-13
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.