← New Search ↗ Social Card

Derek Gingera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1991-06-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 2 1 0 1 0.500 0.0963 0.1088 0.3160 0.3569
2008-09 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 62 23 29 52 0.839 0.1614 0.1743 0.5300 0.5724
2009-10 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 41 14 13 27 0.658 0.1268 0.1313 0.4161 0.4308
2010-11 Selkirk Steelers MJHL 61 33 27 60 0.984 0.1893 0.1868 0.6215 0.6132
2011-12 Winnipeg Blues MJHL 53 43 28 71 1.340 0.2579 0.2415 0.8465 0.7926
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Castleton D3 LittleEast SR 25 8 6 14 0.560
2014-15 Castleton D3 LittleEast JR 21 3 9 12 0.571
2013-14 Castleton D3 LittleEast SO 22 10 5 15 0.682
2012-13 Castleton D3 LittleEast FR 20 1 1 2 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2012-13 · Castleton
-46.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17194
Forward overall
#639
Forward born in 1991
#113
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Skidmore · 2023-24
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2017-18
0.350 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2015-16
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.