← New Search ↗ Social Card

Collin Peters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-02-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000
2014-15 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 28 6 5 11 0.393 0.2318 0.2410 1.1800 1.2269
2015-16 USHL 54 16 16 32 0.593 0.3496 0.3473 1.7798 1.7679
2016-17 Lincoln Stars USHL 27 6 5 11 0.407 0.2403 0.2264 1.2236 1.1530
2017-18 Lincoln Stars USHL 48 8 9 17 0.354 0.2089 0.1865 1.0638 0.9496
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 22 2 3 5 0.227
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 22 1 1 2 0.091
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 19 0 1 1 0.053
2016-17 Northern Michigan D1 WCHA FR 23 2 3 5 0.217
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2016-17 · Northern Michigan
-16.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20090
Forward overall
#905
Forward born in 1997
#1951
in USHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Brockport · 2013-14
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2015-16
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Norbert · 2018-19
0.833 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.