IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Blake Gober Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Amarillo Bulls NAHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Chilliwack Chiefs BCHL 55 12 21 33 0.600 0.2312 0.2332 0.8732 0.8808
2014-15 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 54 9 12 21 0.389 0.2294 0.2145 1.1680 1.0920
2015-16 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 47 11 11 22 0.468 0.2761 0.2453 1.4059 1.2491
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Penn State D1 BigTen SR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Penn State D1 BigTen JR 30 0 3 3 0.100
2017-18 Penn State D1 BigTen SO 16 2 1 3 0.188
2016-17 Penn State D1 BigTen FR 16 1 5 6 0.375
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.38
2016-17 · Penn State
+88.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#20562
Forward overall
#769
Forward born in 1995

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Dylan Walchuk
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG
David Goodwin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jonny Ruiz
Johnson & Wales · 2014-15
0.731 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Maxwell Donohoe
Neumann · 2023-24
1.500 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Stuart Stefan
Castleton · 2006-07
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.