IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.D. Dudek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-29 Country: USA
2014 · Round 5, Pick #152  ·  New Jersey Devils New Jersey Devils
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USHL 54 10 8 18 0.333 0.1966 0.1944 1.0010 0.9897
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 39 7 5 12 0.308
2017-18 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 36 7 12 19 0.528
2016-17 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 40 13 9 22 0.550
2015-16 Boston College D1 HockeyEast — 34 1 2 3 0.088
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2015-16 · Boston College
-47.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27612
Forward overall
#1139
Forward born in 1996
#2623
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Seth Adams
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tim Lappin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Brown (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Peter Magagna
SUNY Oswego · 2002-03
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Arlen Marshall
Manhattanville · 2003-04
0.840 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Elliott Altberg
Hamilton · 2000-01
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.