← New Search ↗ Social Card

Rem Pitlick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-04-02 Country: USA
2016 · Round 3, Pick #76  ·  Nashville Predators Nashville Predators
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Waterloo Black Hawks USHL 47 7 9 16 0.340 0.2008 0.2103 1.0224 1.0709
2015-16 Muskegon Lumberjacks USHL 56 46 43 89 1.589 0.9375 0.9384 4.7733 4.7779
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 38 21 24 45 1.184
2017-18 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 38 12 19 31 0.816
2016-17 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 36 14 18 32 0.889
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.60
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.89
2016-17 · Minnesota
+47.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.81 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.93 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
0.98 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2003-04
1.800 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2018-19
1.636 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.