← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Spicer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs EHL 43 5 14 19 0.442 0.1021 0.1104 0.2162 0.2338
2014-15 USHL 50 2 7 9 0.180 0.1062 0.1054 0.5406 0.5363
2015-16 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 33 0 4 4 0.121 0.0715 0.0676 0.3640 0.3442
2016-17 Islanders Hockey Club USPHL-Premier-Classic 25 2 7 9 0.360 0.1011 0.0957 0.2960 0.2801
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 33 0 3 3 0.091
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast JR 30 1 2 3 0.100
2018-19 Maine D1 HockeyEast SO 4 0 1 1 0.250
2017-18 Maine D1 HockeyEast 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#17974
Defenseman overall
#2224
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Utica · 2023-24
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.481 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.