← New Search ↗ Social Card

Justin Rapp Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-02-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 55 7 11 18 0.327 0.1203 0.1183 0.3455 0.3399
2023-24 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 60 15 32 47 0.783 0.2878 0.2694 0.8268 0.7739
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286
2024-25 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286
2024-25 Utica D3 UCHC 14 2 3 5 0.357
2023-24 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286
2022-23 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286
2021-22 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286
2020-21 Missouri State University ACHA_D1 28 15 21 36 1.286

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D1
10%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22722
Forward overall
#1222
Forward born in 2003
#1680
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Penn State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.42 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Roger Williams · 2024-25
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2017-18
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2011-12
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.