IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gordi Myer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USHL 47 0 6 6 0.128 0.0753 0.0748 0.3835 0.3807
2015-16 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 59 3 15 18 0.305 0.1800 0.1703 0.9163 0.8672
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Ohio State D1 BigTen SR 36 5 9 14 0.389
2018-19 Ohio State D1 BigTen JR 36 1 8 9 0.250
2017-18 Ohio State D1 BigTen SO 39 1 11 12 0.308
2016-17 Ohio State D1 BigTen FR 22 1 9 10 0.455
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2016-17 · Ohio State
+264.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11579
Defenseman overall
#1665
Defenseman born in 1996
#3395
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Max Everson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Harvard (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Vinny Muto
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Niagara (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Joseph Fiala
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Parker
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chance Gorman
Elmira · 2018-19
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Williams
Marian · 2007-08
1.148 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Keenan Hodgson
Amherst · 2012-13
1.111 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.