IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jack Badini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-19 Country: USA
2017 · Round 3, Pick #91  ·  Anaheim Ducks Anaheim Ducks
Signed Professionally

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Lincoln Stars USHL 28 2 1 3 0.107 0.0632 0.0687 0.3217 0.3498
2015-16 Lincoln Stars USHL 56 4 7 11 0.196 0.1159 0.1206 0.5899 0.6141
2016-17 Chicago Steel USHL 59 28 14 42 0.712 0.4199 0.4157 2.1381 2.1165
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Harvard D1 ECAC JR 31 6 8 14 0.452
2018-19 Harvard D1 ECAC SO 33 8 12 20 0.606
2017-18 Harvard D1 ECAC FR 33 10 7 17 0.515
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2017-18 · Harvard
+102.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Ryan Papa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.72 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Adam Gilmour
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Boston College (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Average
NCAAe PPG
Kevin Duane
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.67 PPG
→ Boston University (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Schempp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Joe Cox
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ryan Cusin
UMass Boston · 2013-14
1.600 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Christopher Miraldo
Westfield State · 2021-22
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Patrick Stillar
SUNY Morrisville · 2010-11
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.