← New Search ↗ Social Card

J.D. Greenway Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-27 Country: USA
2016 · Round 3, Pick #72  ·  Toronto Maple Leafs Toronto Maple Leafs
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 53 1 5 6 0.113 0.0841 0.0859 0.4224 0.4314
2015-16 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 64 5 23 28 0.438 0.3252 0.3169 1.6325 1.5907
2018-19 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 58 9 24 33 0.569 0.3357 0.3028 1.7089 1.5416
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast 14 2 3 5 0.357
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast 34 1 9 10 0.294
2017-18 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 12 2 1 3 0.250
2016-17 Wisconsin D1 BigTen 34 1 6 7 0.206
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2016-17 · Wisconsin
+7.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

60%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
30%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14829
Forward overall
#680
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2002-03
1.375 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2004-05
0.926 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Adrian · 2018-19
1.103 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.