IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Joseph Maguire Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 New York Bobcats EHL 32 2 4 6 0.188 0.0433 0.0473 0.0917 0.1003
2014-15 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 11 0 1 1 0.091 0.0536 0.0538 0.2730 0.2741
2015-16 Sioux Falls Stampede USHL 51 0 10 10 0.196 0.1157 0.1108 0.5890 0.5641
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Brown D1 ECAC JR 12 0 1 1 0.083
2017-18 Brown D1 ECAC SO 18 0 5 5 0.278
2016-17 Brown D1 ECAC FR 26 0 4 4 0.154
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2016-17 · Brown
+85.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12651
Defenseman overall
#1760
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Johnny Hrabovsky
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Victor Björkung
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adam Czarnecki
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.