← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Hurley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-11-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 OJHL 28 1 7 8 0.286 0.0700 0.0657
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Clarkson D1 ECAC SR 24 2 4 6 0.250
2020-21 Clarkson D1 ECAC JR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2019-20 Clarkson D1 ECAC SO 28 3 12 15 0.536
2018-19 Clarkson D1 ECAC FR 24 1 6 7 0.292
2017-18 Post D2 NE10 JR 25 5 12 17 0.680
2016-17 Western New England D3 CNE SO 26 2 2 4 0.154
2015-16 Western New England D3 CNE FR 25 1 7 8 0.320
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.06
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2015-16 · Western New England
+416.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19415
Defenseman overall
#2073
Defenseman born in 1994

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.14 PPG
→ Providence (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Average D
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ Brown
0.15 No data
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Southern Maine (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.06 Average D
NCAAe PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.