IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Linkenheld Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 21 3 5 8 0.381 0.1400 0.1454 0.4021 0.4175
2014-15 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 50 23 20 43 0.860 0.3160 0.3115 — —
2015-16 Johnstown Tomahawks NAHL 54 19 31 50 0.926 0.3402 0.3203 0.9773 0.9202
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SR 38 5 5 10 0.263
2018-19 Bowling Green D1 WCHA JR 32 4 4 8 0.250
2017-18 Bowling Green D1 WCHA SO 13 0 3 3 0.231
2016-17 Bowling Green D1 WCHA FR 10 1 0 1 0.100
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.10
2016-17 · Bowling Green
-63.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14812
Forward overall
#578
Forward born in 1995
#684
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Todd Skirving
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ RIT (0.65 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Drew Iannucci
Arcadia · 2021-22
0.920 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lukas Ciotti
Adrian · 2010-11
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Travis Broughman
SUNY Oswego · 2017-18
0.852 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.