IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Drew Iannucci Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 30 10 13 23 0.767 0.1032 0.1032 0.2610 0.2610
2021-22 Charlotte Rush USPHL-Premier 44 20 24 44 1.000 0.1346 0.1253 0.3404 0.3168
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Arcadia D3 MAC SR 15 3 4 7 0.467
2024-25 Arcadia D3 MAC JR 15 6 4 10 0.667
2023-24 Arcadia D3 MAC SO 23 3 7 10 0.435
2022-23 Arcadia D3 MAC FR 25 6 17 23 0.920
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.92
2022-23 · Arcadia
+757.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#33158
Forward overall
#1383
Forward born in 2001
#1163
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

Bob Kinne
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Bradley Duwe
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Andy Singerhouse
St. Thomas · 2010-11
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Joe Harren
St. John's · 2008-09
0.421 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustaf Arfelt
Southern New Hampshire · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.