← New Search ↗ Social Card

A.J. Drobot Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-14 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Jersey Rockets EHL 35 11 18 29 0.829 0.1914 0.2185
2015-16 Austin Bruins NAHL 43 6 8 14 0.326 0.1196 0.1300 0.3437 0.3735
2016-17 Austin Bruins NAHL 51 14 16 30 0.588 0.2161 0.2231
2017-18 Fargo Force USHL 57 14 11 25 0.439 0.2587 0.2463 1.3173 1.2540
2018-19 Fargo Force USHL 57 9 8 17 0.298 0.1759 0.1584 0.8956 0.8063
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Maine D1 HockeyEast 23 2 1 3 0.130
2020-21 Maine D1 HockeyEast 16 2 2 4 0.250
2019-20 Maine D1 HockeyEast 34 4 5 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2019-20 · Maine
+59.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

20%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25038
Forward overall
#1223
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2023-24
0.739 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Salve Regina · 2023-24
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Neumann · 2013-14
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.