← New Search ↗ Social Card

Phil Erickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-09-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 6 1 1 2 0.333 0.1321 0.1458
2015-16 Coulee Region Chill NAHL 51 9 7 16 0.314 0.1243 0.1317 0.3294 0.3490
2016-17 Madison Capitols USHL 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Whitecourt Wolverines AJHL 8 3 0 3 0.375 0.1244 0.1164 0.3475 0.3252
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Wilkes D3 MAC GR 26 7 9 16 0.615
2021-22 Wilkes D3 MAC SR 25 14 12 26 1.040
2020-21 Wilkes D1 JR 11 3 4 7 0.636
2020-21 Wilkes D3 MAC JR 11 3 4 7 0.636
2019-20 Wilkes D1 SO 29 11 9 20 0.690
2019-20 Wilkes D3 MAC SO 29 11 9 20 0.690
2018-19 Wilkes D1 FR 26 10 3 13 0.500
2018-19 Wilkes D3 MAC FR 26 10 3 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Wilkes
+358.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#31803
Forward overall
#1498
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2024-25
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Olaf · 2007-08
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.