| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Des Moines Buccaneers | USHL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2017-18 | Kindersley Klippers | SJHL | 44 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 0.386 | 0.1177 | 0.1227 | 0.2864 | 0.2986 |
| 2018-19 | Kindersley Klippers | SJHL | 57 | 19 | 25 | 44 | 0.772 | 0.2351 | 0.2330 | 0.5721 | 0.5669 |
| 2019-20 | — | SJHL | 31 | 14 | 14 | 28 | 0.903 | 0.2751 | 0.2751 | 0.6694 | 0.6694 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-24 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 24 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.292 |
| 2022-23 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 22 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.091 |
| 2021-22 | Marian | D3 | NCHA | — | 17 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0.588 |
| 2020-21 | St. Thomas | D3 | — | FR | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 1.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.