IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

James Callahan Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Green Bay Gamblers USHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 43 4 25 29 0.674 0.2025 0.2042 0.5555 0.5601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 27 5 8 13 0.481
2018-19 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 28 2 5 7 0.250
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 27 3 14 17 0.630
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.63
2017-18 · Trinity
+226.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3995
Defenseman overall
#825
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Nick Neville
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.