IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ty Amonte Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U18 Team NTDP-U18 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2016-17 Penticton Vees BCHL 58 17 20 37 0.638 0.2458 0.2480 0.9283 0.9365
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UConn D1 HockeyEast — 30 6 5 11 0.367
2021-22 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 22 1 4 5 0.227
2020-21 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 2 1 1 2 1.000
2019-20 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 37 8 8 16 0.432
2017-18 Boston University D1 HockeyEast — 36 6 3 9 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Boston University
+17.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23024
Forward overall
#1107
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Blake Winiecki
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Austin Vieth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kenny Gillespie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ RPI (0.20 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

George Thurston
Southern New Hampshire · 2016-17
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Mahony
Gustavus Adolphus · 2021-22
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dave McKenna
Elmira · 2004-05
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.