| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Edina High | USHS-MN | 25 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 0.600 | 0.1615 | 0.1552 | 0.1457 | 0.1400 |
| 2015-16 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 54 | 3 | 15 | 18 | 0.333 | 0.1321 | 0.1377 | — | — |
| 2016-17 | Cedar Rapids RoughRiders | USHL | 34 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.088 | 0.0542 | 0.0519 | 0.2599 | 0.2488 |
| 2017-18 | Minot Minotauros | NAHL | 32 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0.281 | 0.1114 | 0.1046 | 0.2952 | 0.2771 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Wilkes | D3 | — | FR | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2021-22 | St. Scholastica | D3 | MIAC | SR | 23 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.304 |
| 2020-21 | St. Scholastica | D1 | — | JR | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 1.000 |
| 2020-21 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | JR | 13 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 1.000 |
| 2019-20 | St. Scholastica | D1 | — | SO | 27 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2019-20 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | SO | 27 | 0 | 9 | 9 | 0.333 |
| 2018-19 | St. Scholastica | D1 | — | FR | 25 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2018-19 | St. Scholastica | D3 | — | FR | 25 | 4 | 12 | 16 | 0.640 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.