IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bram Scheerer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-06-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Edina High USHS-MN 25 2 6 8 0.320 0.0405 0.0430 0.0777 0.0825
2015-16 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 2 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2017-18 Minnesota Magicians NAHL 45 12 9 21 0.467 0.1715 0.1783 0.4926 0.5122
2018-19 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 53 6 7 13 0.245 0.1447 0.1385 0.7367 0.7051
2019-20 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 37 14 20 34 0.919 0.3376 0.3376 0.9699 0.9699
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Union D1 ECAC — 12 1 2 3 0.250
2021-22 Union D1 ECAC — 8 0 3 3 0.375
2020-21 Union D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20402
Forward overall
#1005
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jeff Olitch
Wentworth · 2004-05
1.143 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Emmond Bell
Norwich · 2006-07
0.640 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Caprio
Becker · 2005-06
0.818 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.