← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ashton Altmann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-05-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Duluth East High USHS-MN 24 8 12 20 0.833 0.1055 0.1067 0.2024 0.2047
2015-16 Chicago Steel USHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 NAHL 53 3 8 11 0.207 0.0762 0.0791 0.2190 0.2275
2017-18 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 38 6 6 12 0.316 0.1160 0.1147 0.3333 0.3297
2018-19 Minnesota Wilderness NAHL 54 4 10 14 0.259 0.0953 0.0900 0.2737 0.2585
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SR 21 3 4 7 0.333
2021-22 St. Olaf D3 MIAC JR 26 6 8 14 0.538
2020-21 St. Olaf D1 MIAC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2020-21 St. Olaf D3 MIAC SO 2 0 1 1 0.500
2019-20 St. Olaf D1 MIAC FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
2019-20 St. Olaf D3 MIAC FR 20 1 6 7 0.350
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · St. Olaf
+309.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#45423
Forward overall
#2433
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Anna Maria · 2021-22
0.864 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hobart · 2014-15
0.368 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.