IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trevor Poirier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 57 13 16 29 0.509 0.1707 0.1750 0.4708 0.4825
2013-14 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 60 20 19 39 0.650 0.2180 0.2121 0.6015 0.5853
2014-15 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 58 23 18 41 0.707 0.2371 0.2181 0.6542 0.6018
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 9 1 3 4 0.444
2015-16 Hobart D3 SUNYAC — 19 3 4 7 0.368
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.37
2015-16 · Hobart
+99.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#26465
Forward overall
#1029
Forward born in 1994
#764
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Christian Lloyd
Elmira · 2015-16
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Devin Cobbold
Wentworth · 2011-12
0.625 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brett Way
Augsburg · 2004-05
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.