← New Search ↗ Social Card

Braeden McKinnon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 1 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Aurora Tigers OJHL 48 6 12 18 0.375 0.1048 0.1048 0.2588 0.2588
2020-21 Stouffville Spirit OJHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Navan Grads CCHL 30 4 5 9 0.300 0.0856 0.0791 0.2322 0.2147
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SR 28 15 14 29 1.036
2024-25 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC JR 20 7 13 20 1.000
2023-24 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC SO 25 13 8 21 0.840
2022-23 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 22 7 12 19 0.864
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.86
2022-23 · Anna Maria
+1175.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#42576
Forward overall
#1958
Forward born in 2001
#4253
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2007-08
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2007-08
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Manhattanville · 2021-22
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.