IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Jarrell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1987-06-03 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2005-06 Collingwood Blues OJHL 48 16 15 31 0.646 0.1583 0.1595 0.4446 0.4478
2006-07 Port Hope Predators OJHL 40 15 19 34 0.850 0.2083 0.1994 0.5852 0.5601
2007-08 Toronto Dixie Beehives OJHL 37 17 31 48 1.297 0.3180 0.2900 0.8932 0.8145
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 19 1 3 4 0.210
2008-09 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2008-09 · Elmira
-23.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15897
Forward overall
#547
Forward born in 1987
#524
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Justin Parizek
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Davey Middleton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
T.J. Sarcona
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Nelson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jhuwon Davis
New England College · 2018-19
0.741 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Dreger
Neumann · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Steve Schroeder
Norwich · 2008-09
0.742 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.