← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Sawyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-05-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 North York Rangers OJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0306 0.0335 0.0861 0.0942
2004-05 North York Rangers OJHL 44 3 7 10 0.227 0.0557 0.0581 0.1565 0.1632
2005-06 OJHL 41 5 11 16 0.390 0.0956 0.0962 0.2687 0.2704
2006-07 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 36 6 15 21 0.583 0.1430 0.1367 0.4016 0.3840
2007-08 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 9 19 28 0.483 0.1860 0.1712 0.7026 0.6468
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Elmira D3 UCHC SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2010-11 Elmira D3 UCHC JR 18 3 2 5 0.278
2009-10 Elmira D3 UCHC SO 27 0 6 6 0.222
2008-09 Elmira D3 UCHC FR 18 0 8 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2008-09 · Elmira
+199.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#8375
Defenseman overall
#1029
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Salem State · 2023-24
1.269 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Marian · 2011-12
1.385 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.