← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brock Sawyer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1987-05-27 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 North York Rangers OJHL 8 0 1 1 0.125 0.0349 0.0382 0.0863 0.0944
2004-05 North York Rangers OJHL 44 3 7 10 0.227 0.0635 0.0662 0.1569 0.1637
2005-06 OJHL 41 5 11 16 0.390 0.1090 0.1097 0.2693 0.2710
2006-07 St. Michael's Buzzers OJHL 36 6 15 21 0.583 0.1630 0.1559 0.4025 0.3849
2007-08 Powell River Kings BCHL 58 9 19 28 0.483 0.1879 0.1730 0.7041 0.6482
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2011-12 Elmira D3 SR 27 3 8 11 0.407
2010-11 Elmira D3 JR 18 3 2 5 0.278
2009-10 Elmira D3 SO 27 0 6 6 0.222
2008-09 Elmira D3 FR 18 0 8 8 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2008-09 · Elmira
+183.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5075
Defenseman overall
#888
Defenseman born in 1987

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Bethel · 2018-19
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Geneseo · 2023-24
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2004-05
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.