← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Miller Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-09-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 U.S. National U17 Team NTDP-U18 6 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 USHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0983 0.1053 0.5007 0.5363
2017-18 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 54 5 4 9 0.167 0.0983 0.1004 0.5007 0.5114
2018-19 Sioux City Musketeers USHL 55 15 13 28 0.509 0.3003 0.2912 1.5290 1.4829
2019-20 Lincoln Stars USHL 47 13 17 30 0.638 0.3765 0.3765 1.9171 1.9171
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2023-24 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 37 7 13 20 0.540
2022-23 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 34 13 12 25 0.735
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 30 10 3 13 0.433
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 26 8 5 13 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.19
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2020-21 · Nebraska Omaha
+168.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
15%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#15980
Forward overall
#755
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Army (0.67 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ RPI (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.79 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Worcester State · 2023-24
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2016-17
0.893 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.