← New Search ↗ Social Card

Cam Burke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-01-08 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier-Classic 1 0 1 1 1.000 0.2807 0.3197 0.8222 0.9363
2016-17 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 60 6 13 19 0.317 0.1868 0.1940 0.9512 0.9877
2017-18 USHL 62 10 21 31 0.500 0.2949 0.2916 1.5017 1.4847
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Boston College D1 HockeyEast 36 2 8 10 0.278
2021-22 Notre Dame D1 BigTen 38 8 11 19 0.500
2020-21 Notre Dame D1 BigTen JR 14 1 2 3 0.214
2019-20 Notre Dame D1 BigTen SO 36 2 1 3 0.083
2018-19 Notre Dame D1 BigTen FR 32 4 1 5 0.156
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2018-19 · Notre Dame
-27.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

68%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
32%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20131
Forward overall
#994
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.72 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

SUNY Morrisville · 2009-10
1.154 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2000-01
1.231 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2014-15
0.955 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.