IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Marshall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-10-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Omaha Lancers USHL 46 8 8 16 0.348 0.2052 0.2105 1.0446 1.0718
2017-18 Langley Rivermen BCHL 44 9 14 23 0.523 0.2014 0.2010 0.7607 0.7592
2018-19 Northeast Generals NAHL 54 15 18 33 0.611 0.2245 0.2162 0.6450 0.6210
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Brown D1 ECAC — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Brown D1 ECAC — 10 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Brown D1 ECAC — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Brown D1 ECAC FR 11 1 3 4 0.364
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2019-20 · Brown
+102.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

57%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25108
Forward overall
#1227
Forward born in 1998

D1 Comparables

Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emil Romig
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.00 PPG
→ Denver (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jonathan Davis
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.03 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braden Crone
Concordia · 2013-14
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Collin Kerchoff
Concordia · 2021-22
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Steuck
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2024-25
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.