← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Staum Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-01-08 Country: USA
2016 · Round 5, Pick #124  ·  Montreal Canadiens Montreal Canadiens
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Hill-Murray School USHS-MN 24 0 7 7 0.292 0.0369 0.0366 0.0709 0.0703
2016-17 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 55 0 16 16 0.291 0.1716 0.1696 0.8737 0.8635
2017-18 Dubuque Fighting Saints USHL 18 0 3 3 0.167 0.0983 0.0923 0.5007 0.4700
2018-19 Chicago Steel USHL 32 2 7 9 0.281 0.1659 0.1472 0.8446 0.7493
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Colorado College D1 NCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 Colorado College D1 NCHC 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Colorado College D1 NCHC 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2019-20 · Colorado College
-23.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
20%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#10623
Defenseman overall
#1864
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Manhattanville · 2018-19
0.565 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2011-12
1.080 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Aurora · 2018-19
1.259 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.