IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Johnny Kim Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-02-22 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Tulsa Crude USHL 56 13 9 22 0.393 0.2318 0.2358 1.1763 1.1967
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Babson D3 LittleEast SR 18 10 10 20 1.111
2004-05 Babson D3 LittleEast JR 28 20 22 42 1.500
2003-04 Babson D3 LittleEast SO 28 18 19 37 1.321
2002-03 Babson D3 LittleEast FR 22 13 13 26 1.182
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.18
2002-03 · Babson
+485.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#22408
Forward overall
#692
Forward born in 1983
#2194
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Mason Jobst
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.86 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Mackenzie MacEachern
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.42 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Aman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jimmy DeVito
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ RPI (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jeff Kubiak
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Cornell (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brent Wold
Utica · 2011-12
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Kangas
St. Thomas · 2016-17
0.474 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dustin Fulton
Hamline · 2004-05
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.