← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Smallidge Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1998-05-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 St. Thomas Academy USHS-MN 25 4 14 18 0.720 0.0912 0.0921 0.1749 0.1767
2016-17 Central Illinois Flying Aces USHL 57 1 10 11 0.193 0.1139 0.1146 0.5797 0.5835
2017-18 USHL 45 1 5 6 0.133 0.0786 0.0752 0.4004 0.3831
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC 8 0 1 1 0.125
2020-21 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC JR 26 2 11 13 0.500
2019-20 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC SO 27 4 4 8 0.296
2018-19 Nebraska Omaha D1 NCHC FR 28 1 1 2 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2018-19 · Nebraska Omaha
-16.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
57%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14363
Defenseman overall
#2270
Defenseman born in 1998

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ Brown
0.08 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Air Force (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2014-15
0.762 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Franklin Pierce · 2021-22
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Plymouth State · 2023-24
1.037 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.