IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Tessier Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-05-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 43 15 23 38 0.884 0.1156 0.1156 0.2999 0.2999
2021-22 Pittsburgh Vengeance USPHL-Premier 43 32 28 60 1.395 0.1825 0.1798 0.4736 0.4666
2022-23 New Hampshire Avalanche EHL 32 6 5 11 0.344 0.0794 0.0766 0.1682 0.1623
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 25 3 2 5 0.200
2023-24 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 — 22 3 3 6 0.273
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.27
2023-24 · Franklin Pierce
+170.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#19511
Forward overall
#1044
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sean Bradley
Endicott · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Sean Cryer
Neumann · 2003-04
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brian Bina
Wisconsin-Superior · 2005-06
0.308 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.