IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brian Bina Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1985-05-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Bismarck Bobcats NAHL 51 2 10 12 0.235 0.0836 0.0858 0.2470 0.2535
2004-05 Lincoln Stars USHL 39 1 6 7 0.179 0.1059 0.1021 0.5288 0.5097
2005-06 — USHL 15 1 1 2 0.133 0.0786 0.0716 0.3927 0.3579
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SR 27 2 5 7 0.259
2008-09 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — JR 30 1 12 13 0.433
2007-08 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — SO 25 4 8 12 0.480
2006-07 Wisconsin-Superior D3 — FR 26 2 6 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2006-07 · Wisconsin-Superior
+289.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#12953
Defenseman overall
#1256
Defenseman born in 1985

D1 Comparables

Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Jackson
Wisconsin-Stout · 2015-16
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bill McGinnis
New England College · 2006-07
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dominic Brenza
Stevenson · 2015-16
0.458 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.