IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sean Cryer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-06-05 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 Streetsville Derbys (OLD) OJHL 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0175 0.0172 0.0489 0.0480
2002-03 Bramalea Blues OJHL 43 5 19 24 0.558 0.1368 0.1286 0.3820 0.3590
2003-04 Bramalea Blues OJHL 37 5 25 30 0.811 0.1987 0.1778 0.5550 0.4966
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Neumann D3 — SR 24 3 10 13 0.542
2006-07 Neumann D3 — JR 23 0 10 10 0.435
2005-06 Neumann D3 — SO 23 2 10 12 0.522
2004-05 Neumann D3 — FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2004-05 · Neumann
+34.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#6299
Defenseman overall
#788
Defenseman born in 1983
#1340
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jack Lewis
Lake Forest · 2012-13
0.643 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendon Gysbers
St. Norbert · 2017-18
0.871 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Drew Gannon
UMass Boston · 2014-15
0.414 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.