IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sampo Ranta Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-05-31 Country: Finland
2018 NHL Draft Round 3, Pick #78  ·  Colorado Avalanche Colorado Avalanche
Signed Professionally
Örebro HK · SHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 — USHL 30 6 3 9 0.300 0.1844 0.2043 0.8839 0.9794
2017-18 — USHL 53 23 14 37 0.698 0.4291 0.4542 2.0567 2.1768
2023-24 — SHL 50 17 14 31 0.620 1.5500 1.8113 — —
2024-25 — SHL 48 10 15 25 0.521 1.3020 1.4452 — —
2025-26 Örebro HK SHL 16 3 3 6 0.375 0.9375 0.9375 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Minnesota D1 BigTen JR 31 19 12 31 1.000
2019-20 Minnesota D1 BigTen SO 35 12 8 20 0.571
2018-19 Minnesota D1 BigTen FR 36 6 10 16 0.444
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.30
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.44
2018-19 · Minnesota
+46.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

⭐ Elite profile — high probability of D1 placement; comparable to top-end prospects
25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Age-Out / Club
72%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

Vinnie Hinostroza
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.94 D1 FR PPG)
0.80 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Cammarata
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.69 D1 FR PPG)
1.02 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Zach Stepan
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.39 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.84 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Justin Kloos
USHL · 2012-13 · 1.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.97 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sam Anderson
Albertus Magnus · 2017-18
0.720 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2022-23
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Reifler
Elmira · 2016-17
1.067 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.