IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Austin Martinsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-05-11 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Farmington High USHS-MN 24 23 23 46 1.917 0.2361 0.2264 — —
2015-16 Minot Minotauros NAHL 54 17 12 29 0.537 0.1907 0.1984 0.5638 0.5867
2016-17 — USHL 20 3 1 4 0.200 0.1180 0.1127 0.5892 0.5629
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Augsburg D3 MIAC GR 30 16 22 38 1.267
2020-21 Augsburg D1 — SR 5 4 8 12 2.400
2020-21 Augsburg D3 MIAC SR 5 4 8 12 2.400
2019-20 Augsburg D1 — JR 23 8 11 19 0.826
2019-20 Augsburg D3 MIAC JR 23 8 11 19 0.826
2018-19 Augsburg D1 — SO 23 6 8 14 0.609
2018-19 Augsburg D3 MIAC SO 23 6 8 14 0.609
2017-18 Augsburg D3 MIAC FR 24 2 4 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2017-18 · Augsburg
+98.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#39566
Forward overall
#1935
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinn Waller
Adrian · 2005-06
1.586 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Stroud
Western New England · 2009-10
1.077 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Kyle Luschinski
St. Scholastica · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.